When alcohol was banned in the US it produced a criminal underclass in the US which supplied it. Many recreational drugs are also currently banned - but it is quite clear that "banned" is not the same as "unavailable". And their provision also generates a lot of crime. Another issue which occurs to me is enforcement.
What should the the legal penalty for smoking a cigarette? A fine? House arrest? One could argue that cigarettes are more damaging than marijuana so the punishment should be at least as severe as for having or smoking that drug. Well if you had a ban, that would only stop people smoking in public if the penalty was something to make people sit up and take notice as they are so used to doing it at the moment.
Criminalize Cigarette Smoking Now!
I'm not sure what that would be I, but I'd imagine it would have to be more than a smack on the wrist. Or, "the right to smoke ends where the other man's nose begins," as it were. While I share the anti-"total ban" sentiment that some have voiced here, I agree with Maratrean's premise. Smoking in public should be disallowed the same way other safety hazards are disallowed in public places. Chthonios talk , 10 April UTC. To risk flogging the same dead horse as Ace above, this is a ridiculous infringement on human rights. To clarify, I'm not a regular smoker less than 20 a month, if any at all , and when I do smoke I appreciate that other people don't want to breathe it in, so I compromise by moving away from them and I smoke by myself.
When I have the occasional ciggy I smoke it outside because I hate the smell that lingers in my room and reeks out my clothes.
More often than not when my non-smoking friends see me smoke, they begin coughing loudly for hilarious comic effect or chant "dirty fucking smoker" at me, and I have to resist the urge to tell them that I am a grown man and can smoke if I want to, and failing that, for them to go fuck themselves. I don't entirely agree with the widespread scope of the current smoking ban, but I can appreciate why it was brought in. You've already taken away the freedom for smokers to smoke in public buildings, and now the occasional one that walks past you in the street, forcing you to breathe in a tiny amount of smoke when you come within a few feet of him, has put you out to the extent that you feel a ban on smoking outside is necessary?
- Navigation menu;
- columbia university creative writing fellowship.
- Conclusion of Smoking Should Be Banned - Argumentative Essay;
- essay writing introduction paragraph.
- argumentative essay on story of an hour.
- Argumentative essay ban smoking in public places.
As for banning smoking in privacy, a lot of small apartment blocks today have a ban on smoking anyway, which their tenants are made aware of upon signing the lease - I can't smoke in my current rented property. But banning smoking in owned property? I can't think of a more ridiculously painful ultra-liberal, "it's-for-your-own-good!
Forcing kids to breathe in smoke is something that disgusts me - my dad smokes and when I was growing up he smoked in one room only and I wasn't allowed in there when he was - but ultimately that's down to how much of a clueless fucking idiot of a parent one is. Smoke going through non-existent air vents between adjoining properties? Seeping through walls into the house next door? The only way for that to physically happen would be for a room to have a higher ratio of carbon monoxide against oxygen and natural air.
The fact is that smoking enthusiasts have already made compromises to fulfil the wishes of the super-duper-we're-so-goddamn-fucking-healthy-and-better-than-you-dirty-smoking-cunts anti-smoking lobbyists, and to go one step further and ban it in homes is to go one step further in taking away a basic human right to do as one pleases within a free society. Your very first sentence in this essay is "I believe that a basic principle of human rights, is that everyone has the right to control what goes into their own body", and this ban you propose is in direct opposition to that statement.
- edinburgh university phd thesis word limit.
- Smoking Should be Banned in All Public Places Essay?
- Homework for me;
- Quality papers at the best prices?
- Our Services.
- Smokefree Policies Improve Health | CDC.
- 2. Smoking Should Be Banned in Public Places Essay.
If someone told me that I couldn't smoke in my own house, in which I live, which I own, which I saved up for, and which I paid for with my own money, I would happily tell them to stick their ban up their arse, because that's where the noxious gases are coming from. According to the pro-smoking group Air Initiative 7 in 10 of you do.
Do you think it is fair to discriminate against smokers, forcing them to stand outside and smoke?
Essay for school students on Should Smoking Be Banned In Public Places
On the other hand is it fair that non-smokers should have to inhale second hand smoke which can dame their health? Do you support this ban or do you oppose it? No, they do not. Exposure to cigarette smoke is a public health risk. Therefore, smoking should be banned in all public places, nationwide.
There has been no attempt to impose a national smoking ban by the U. All current bans are in place because of state and local legislation. Smoking Should be Banned in All Public Places Every year thousands of people die because of having cancer or other tobacco related illnesses due to smoking. Smoking is seen everywhere from our own television screens to even the world wide web; the internet. Tobacco is the substance that is in these cigarettes.
These tobacco products are promoted through tobacco ads that are found almost everywhere you turn. They are in magazines, television screens, on the internet. During the past few decades it has come to light that smoking kills. The federal government mandates that every pack of cigarettes carry a warning on it that smoking can lead to health problems including death. Second hand smoke has been shown to cause cancer.
Second hand smoke has been shown to produce the same negative health effects that smoking first hand does. Cities across the nation are taking it upon themselves to address the issue of smoking in public place because of the evidence about …show more content….
Smoking in Public Places Essay
The hospitality industry has long argued that smoking bans cause great financial difficulty for bars and restaurants because of the link between smoking and drinking. But a new study by the University of Minnesota shows that smoking bans in eight Minnesota cities did not have any significant impact on employment in those businesses Benson.
One of the aspects that are argued is the freedom of choice.
- Smoking in Public Places Essay.
- 1. Smoking Should Be Banned in Public Places Essay;
- Why should smoking be banned in the restaurants?.
- workshop on scientific/research paper writing;
- ethical treatment of animals essay.
Freedom of choice mandates if a person wants to smoke they should be able to. While the freedom of choice issue is debated and measures are taken to assist people in breaking their addiction to smoking there are strong reasons for implementing a nationwide ban on smoking in bars and restaurants. Smokers want to be able to enjoy a cigarette following their meal or while they sip their drinks. They have lobbied to stop bans around the country and threatened to boycott any business that voluntarily places a ban on smoking in their establishment.
For a long time, the hospitality industry maintained that if nonsmokers didn't like smoke, then they shouldn't go into places that allowed it. Few buy that argument any more. Nonsmokers want to go where they want and not have to suffer exposure to smoke as the price they pay. The Tobacco Industry fights smoke-free laws because smoke-free laws result in a decline in the consumption of tobacco products, an increase in the cessation rate among smokers, and an overall. Show More. Read More. Popular Essays.